饼饼谈3:解决智力和意识的终极问题无用之人

饼饼谈3:解决智力和意识的终极问题

49分钟 ·
播放数34
·
评论数0

在这期播客中你会听到:

  • 什么是工业(工程)心理学
  • HMI 在航空航天领域的应用
  • 工业(工程)心理学在自动驾驶领域的应用
  • 从实验阶段到工业阶段的转变
  • 高级算法工程师如何对待现实世界的 corner case
  • General AI 离我们有多远
  • 解决“智力和意识的终极问题”的过程是怎样的(笑)

附提到的论文:

  • RADLMAYR J, GOLD C, LORENZ L. et al. How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving[C]//Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Meeting. 2014
  • SCHMITT K U, SEEGER R, FISCHER H. et al. Saccadic eye movement performance as an indicator of driving ability in elderly drivers[J]. Swiss Medical Weekly, 2015, 145: w14098.
  • BIANCHI PICCININI G F, RODRIGUES C M, LEITO M. et al. Reaction to a critical situation during driving with adaptive cruise control for users and non-users of the system[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 72(1): 116–126.
  • STRAND N, NILSSON J, KARLSSON M A. et al. Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures[J]. Transportation Research Part F Psychology & Behaviour, 2014, 27: 218–228.
  • JAMSON A H, MERAT N, CARSTEN O M J. et al. Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2013, 30(5): 116–125.
  • WAARD D de. The measurement of drivers’mental workload[M]. 2015, 20.
  • C. Gold, D. Damböck, L. Lorenz, and K. J. Bengler, ““Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?,” Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. Annu. Meet., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1938–1942, Sep. 2013.
  • BLOMMER M, CURRY R, KOCHHAR D. et al. The effects of a scheduled driver engagement strategy in automated driving[C]//Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Meeting. 2015.