13 much ado about everything: Chevron, overruled

Don't cry over spilled technocracy. 我们聊了今年6月美国最高院通过Loper Bright案推翻了称霸行政法多年的Chevron原则这件事：与本term的abortion, immunity等众多要案相比，此案或才暗示着美国真正的宪政危机。本期录音分为两部分，第一部分可以作为第二部分的companion服用。

(1:15) I Disclaimer, context*, Loper Bright as a structural change

(13:23) II Reflections/debate thereupon 短视的党争叙事，与行政效率的致命诱惑，请回答1787

*勘误：federal monitors是监视器不是真的监管人住在船上；Jarkesy重音在ke；但我真的不想重录了

References:

(1:29) Chevron v. NRDC (1984) (the OG case)

(5:13) Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024) (the kingslayer case)

(4:18), (30:51) SEC v. Jarkesy (2024) (the SEC 7th Amendment case)

(4:30), (44:05) Corner Post v. Board of Governors of FRS (2024) (the statute of limitations case)

(6:17) FDA v. Brown & Williamson (2000)

(6:29) WV v. EPA (2022); Biden v. NB (2023) (Major Question Doctrine cases)

(6:44) US v. Mead (2000) (agencies need procedures to get Chevron)

(28:52) Bork’s nomination, McConnell’s revenge, and the reshaping of the modern supreme court www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/supreme-revenge/

(34:10) Empirical studies on SEC’s in-court and in-house winning rates www.wsj.com/articles/sec-wins-with-in-house-judges-1430965803?; papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2920940

(36:14) 南山真的必胜客吗？www.legal-theory.org/?mod=info&act=view&id=27582

p.s. One ironically great example on institutional expertise: OH v. EPA (2023) (where Justice Gorsuch mistook nitrous oxide for nitrogen oxide)

BGM credit to Suno AI

Cover pic credit to ourselves in Wyoming!